Rojo v. Tunick 2021 IL App (2d) 200191, 193 N.E.3d 149, 456 Ill.Dec. 181 Rojo v. Tunick is a legal malpractice case decided by the Illinois Appeals Court in 2021.
An attorney, just like any other professional, is held to a certain standard. Attorneys have a duty to represent their clients to the best of their ability. Failure to adhere
Legal malpractice cases serve as pivotal moments in legal history, shaping standards of professional conduct and highlighting the consequences of attorney negligence. Here are some notable cases that have left
When attorneys fail to meet professional standards, the consequences can be severe, especially in high-value cases. Understanding the most common pitfalls in legal practice is crucial for anyone involved in
Knapp v. Ginsberg 67 Cal.App.5th 504 Case Summary Knapp v. Ginsberg is a case decided by the California Court of Appeals after a dispute arose when provisions in a premarital
[Judge et al. v. Kujawa et al., case number 2018-L-013610, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois] An Illinois insurance defense law firm sued a former partner, claiming that
IAVOR STOYANOV, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HIMONT LAW GROUP, LTD. and AL HAROON HUSAIN, Defendants-Appellants. [2024 Ill. App. 221434 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024)] This case raises the issue of appropriate sanctions for
Legal malpractice in Illinois is more common than most assume. The case of Murphy v. Kinnally Flaherty Krentz Loran Hodge & Masur, P.C. exemplifies legal battles over supposed malpractice in
The case of Lehram Capital Investments v. Baker & McKenzie International centers on alleged legal malpractice. The plaintiffs, Lehram Capital Investments and Daniel Rodriguez, a Spaniard residing in Europe, insist
SUBURBAN REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC. and Bryan Barus, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. William Roger CARLSON Jr. and Carlson Partners, Ltd., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants Carmen A. Gaspero Jr., Lisa M. Gaspero, and